Serveur d'exploration sur le peuplier

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Aquatic ecosystem response to timber harvesting for the purpose of restoring aspen.

Identifieur interne : 002792 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002791; suivant : 002793

Aquatic ecosystem response to timber harvesting for the purpose of restoring aspen.

Auteurs : Bobette E. Jones [États-Unis] ; Monika Krupa [États-Unis] ; Kenneth W. Tate [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : pubmed:24376826

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

The removal of conifers through commercial timber harvesting has been successful in restoring aspen, however many aspen stands are located near streams, and there are concerns about potential aquatic ecosystem impairment. We examined the effects of management-scale conifer removal from aspen stands located adjacent to streams on water quality, solar radiation, canopy cover, temperature, aquatic macroinvertebrates, and soil moisture. This 8-year study (2003-2010) involved two projects located in Lassen National Forest. The Pine-Bogard Project consisted of three treatments adjacent to Pine and Bogard Creeks: (i) Phase 1 in January 2004, (ii) Phase 2 in August 2005, and (iii) Phase 3 in January 2008. The Bailey Project consisted of one treatment adjacent to Bailey Creek in September 2006. Treatments involved whole tree removal using track-laying harvesters and rubber tire skidders. More than 80% of all samples analyzed for NO₃-N, NH₄-N, and PO₄-P at Pine, Bogard, and Bailey Creeks were below the detection limit, with the exception of naturally elevated PO₄-P in Bogard Creek. All nutrient concentrations (NO₃-N, NH₄-N, PO₄-P, K, and SO₄-S) showed little variation within streams and across years. Turbidity and TSS exhibited annual variation, but there was no significant increase in the difference between upstream and downstream turbidity and TSS levels. There was a significant decrease in stream canopy cover and increase in the potential fraction of solar radiation reaching the streams in response to the Pine-Bogard Phase 3 and Bailey treatments; however, there was no corresponding increase in stream temperatures. Macroinvertebrate metrics indicated healthy aquatic ecosystem conditions throughout the course of the study. Lastly, the removal of vegetation significantly increased soil moisture in treated stands relative to untreated stands. These results indicate that, with careful planning and implementation of site-specific best management practices, conifer removal to restore aspen stands can be conducted without degrading aquatic ecosystems.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084561
PubMed: 24376826
PubMed Central: PMC3869891


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Aquatic ecosystem response to timber harvesting for the purpose of restoring aspen.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jones, Bobette E" sort="Jones, Bobette E" uniqKey="Jones B" first="Bobette E" last="Jones">Bobette E. Jones</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<nlm:affiliation>Lassen National Forest, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Susanville, California, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Lassen National Forest, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Susanville, California</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Californie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Krupa, Monika" sort="Krupa, Monika" uniqKey="Krupa M" first="Monika" last="Krupa">Monika Krupa</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Californie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tate, Kenneth W" sort="Tate, Kenneth W" uniqKey="Tate K" first="Kenneth W" last="Tate">Kenneth W. Tate</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Californie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:24376826</idno>
<idno type="pmid">24376826</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0084561</idno>
<idno type="pmc">PMC3869891</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002355</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002355</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002355</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">002355</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002355</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Aquatic ecosystem response to timber harvesting for the purpose of restoring aspen.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jones, Bobette E" sort="Jones, Bobette E" uniqKey="Jones B" first="Bobette E" last="Jones">Bobette E. Jones</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<nlm:affiliation>Lassen National Forest, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Susanville, California, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Lassen National Forest, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Susanville, California</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Californie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Krupa, Monika" sort="Krupa, Monika" uniqKey="Krupa M" first="Monika" last="Krupa">Monika Krupa</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Californie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tate, Kenneth W" sort="Tate, Kenneth W" uniqKey="Tate K" first="Kenneth W" last="Tate">Kenneth W. Tate</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Californie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">PloS one</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1932-6203</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2013" type="published">2013</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Animals (MeSH)</term>
<term>California (MeSH)</term>
<term>Conservation of Natural Resources (methods)</term>
<term>Ecosystem (MeSH)</term>
<term>Forestry (methods)</term>
<term>Forestry (statistics & numerical data)</term>
<term>Invertebrates (physiology)</term>
<term>Phosphates (analysis)</term>
<term>Populus (growth & development)</term>
<term>Rivers (MeSH)</term>
<term>Soil (chemistry)</term>
<term>Sunlight (MeSH)</term>
<term>Temperature (MeSH)</term>
<term>Tracheophyta (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Animaux (MeSH)</term>
<term>Californie (MeSH)</term>
<term>Conservation des ressources naturelles (méthodes)</term>
<term>Invertébrés (physiologie)</term>
<term>Lumière du soleil (MeSH)</term>
<term>Phosphates (analyse)</term>
<term>Populus (croissance et développement)</term>
<term>Rivières (MeSH)</term>
<term>Science forêt (méthodes)</term>
<term>Science forêt (statistiques et données numériques)</term>
<term>Sol (composition chimique)</term>
<term>Température (MeSH)</term>
<term>Tracheobionta (MeSH)</term>
<term>Écosystème (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="analysis" xml:lang="en">
<term>Phosphates</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="chemistry" xml:lang="en">
<term>Soil</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en">
<term>California</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="analyse" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Phosphates</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="composition chimique" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Sol</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="croissance et développement" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Populus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en">
<term>Populus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en">
<term>Conservation of Natural Resources</term>
<term>Forestry</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Conservation des ressources naturelles</term>
<term>Science forêt</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Invertébrés</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Invertebrates</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en">
<term>Forestry</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistiques et données numériques" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Science forêt</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Animals</term>
<term>Ecosystem</term>
<term>Rivers</term>
<term>Sunlight</term>
<term>Temperature</term>
<term>Tracheophyta</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Animaux</term>
<term>Californie</term>
<term>Lumière du soleil</term>
<term>Rivières</term>
<term>Température</term>
<term>Tracheobionta</term>
<term>Écosystème</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The removal of conifers through commercial timber harvesting has been successful in restoring aspen, however many aspen stands are located near streams, and there are concerns about potential aquatic ecosystem impairment. We examined the effects of management-scale conifer removal from aspen stands located adjacent to streams on water quality, solar radiation, canopy cover, temperature, aquatic macroinvertebrates, and soil moisture. This 8-year study (2003-2010) involved two projects located in Lassen National Forest. The Pine-Bogard Project consisted of three treatments adjacent to Pine and Bogard Creeks: (i) Phase 1 in January 2004, (ii) Phase 2 in August 2005, and (iii) Phase 3 in January 2008. The Bailey Project consisted of one treatment adjacent to Bailey Creek in September 2006. Treatments involved whole tree removal using track-laying harvesters and rubber tire skidders. More than 80% of all samples analyzed for NO₃-N, NH₄-N, and PO₄-P at Pine, Bogard, and Bailey Creeks were below the detection limit, with the exception of naturally elevated PO₄-P in Bogard Creek. All nutrient concentrations (NO₃-N, NH₄-N, PO₄-P, K, and SO₄-S) showed little variation within streams and across years. Turbidity and TSS exhibited annual variation, but there was no significant increase in the difference between upstream and downstream turbidity and TSS levels. There was a significant decrease in stream canopy cover and increase in the potential fraction of solar radiation reaching the streams in response to the Pine-Bogard Phase 3 and Bailey treatments; however, there was no corresponding increase in stream temperatures. Macroinvertebrate metrics indicated healthy aquatic ecosystem conditions throughout the course of the study. Lastly, the removal of vegetation significantly increased soil moisture in treated stands relative to untreated stands. These results indicate that, with careful planning and implementation of site-specific best management practices, conifer removal to restore aspen stands can be conducted without degrading aquatic ecosystems.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">24376826</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2019</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1932-6203</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet">
<Volume>8</Volume>
<Issue>12</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2013</Year>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>PloS one</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>PLoS One</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Aquatic ecosystem response to timber harvesting for the purpose of restoring aspen.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>e84561</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pone.0084561</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>The removal of conifers through commercial timber harvesting has been successful in restoring aspen, however many aspen stands are located near streams, and there are concerns about potential aquatic ecosystem impairment. We examined the effects of management-scale conifer removal from aspen stands located adjacent to streams on water quality, solar radiation, canopy cover, temperature, aquatic macroinvertebrates, and soil moisture. This 8-year study (2003-2010) involved two projects located in Lassen National Forest. The Pine-Bogard Project consisted of three treatments adjacent to Pine and Bogard Creeks: (i) Phase 1 in January 2004, (ii) Phase 2 in August 2005, and (iii) Phase 3 in January 2008. The Bailey Project consisted of one treatment adjacent to Bailey Creek in September 2006. Treatments involved whole tree removal using track-laying harvesters and rubber tire skidders. More than 80% of all samples analyzed for NO₃-N, NH₄-N, and PO₄-P at Pine, Bogard, and Bailey Creeks were below the detection limit, with the exception of naturally elevated PO₄-P in Bogard Creek. All nutrient concentrations (NO₃-N, NH₄-N, PO₄-P, K, and SO₄-S) showed little variation within streams and across years. Turbidity and TSS exhibited annual variation, but there was no significant increase in the difference between upstream and downstream turbidity and TSS levels. There was a significant decrease in stream canopy cover and increase in the potential fraction of solar radiation reaching the streams in response to the Pine-Bogard Phase 3 and Bailey treatments; however, there was no corresponding increase in stream temperatures. Macroinvertebrate metrics indicated healthy aquatic ecosystem conditions throughout the course of the study. Lastly, the removal of vegetation significantly increased soil moisture in treated stands relative to untreated stands. These results indicate that, with careful planning and implementation of site-specific best management practices, conifer removal to restore aspen stands can be conducted without degrading aquatic ecosystems.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Jones</LastName>
<ForeName>Bobette E</ForeName>
<Initials>BE</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Lassen National Forest, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Susanville, California, United States of America.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Krupa</LastName>
<ForeName>Monika</ForeName>
<Initials>M</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Tate</LastName>
<ForeName>Kenneth W</ForeName>
<Initials>KW</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>PLoS One</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101285081</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1932-6203</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D010710">Phosphates</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D012987">Soil</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D002140" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">California</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D003247" MajorTopicYN="N">Conservation of Natural Resources</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D017753" MajorTopicYN="Y">Ecosystem</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D016468" MajorTopicYN="N">Forestry</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="Y">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D007448" MajorTopicYN="N">Invertebrates</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D010710" MajorTopicYN="N">Phosphates</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="N">analysis</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D032107" MajorTopicYN="N">Populus</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="Y">growth & development</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D045483" MajorTopicYN="Y">Rivers</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D012987" MajorTopicYN="N">Soil</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="N">chemistry</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D013472" MajorTopicYN="N">Sunlight</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D013696" MajorTopicYN="N">Temperature</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D064028" MajorTopicYN="N">Tracheophyta</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>31</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>14</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24376826</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0084561</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">PONE-D-13-30933</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3869891</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList>
<Reference>
<Citation>Tree Physiol. 2011 Jun;31(6):582-91</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21602559</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Environ Qual. 2008 Mar-Apr;37(2):291-5</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18268290</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>PLoS One. 2013 Jun 27;8(6):e68127</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23826370</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Environ Manage. 1997 Mar;21(2):203-17</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9008071</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Environ Manage. 2001 Jun;27(6):787-802</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11393314</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Ecol Lett. 2007 Dec;10(12):1135-42</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17922835</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Californie</li>
</region>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="États-Unis">
<region name="Californie">
<name sortKey="Jones, Bobette E" sort="Jones, Bobette E" uniqKey="Jones B" first="Bobette E" last="Jones">Bobette E. Jones</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Krupa, Monika" sort="Krupa, Monika" uniqKey="Krupa M" first="Monika" last="Krupa">Monika Krupa</name>
<name sortKey="Tate, Kenneth W" sort="Tate, Kenneth W" uniqKey="Tate K" first="Kenneth W" last="Tate">Kenneth W. Tate</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002792 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002792 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Bois
   |area=    PoplarV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:24376826
   |texte=   Aquatic ecosystem response to timber harvesting for the purpose of restoring aspen.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:24376826" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37.
Data generation: Wed Nov 18 12:07:19 2020. Site generation: Wed Nov 18 12:16:31 2020